The agency said it didn't wish more custody of former telecom secretary Siddartha Behura and Raja's former personal secretary R K Chandolia. the 2 were sent to Tihar jail underneath judicial custody.
Earlier, the CBI made Raja before Special CBI decide O P Saini on expiry of his 5-day custody. The agency wished custody for Raja additional} four more days, however got 2 days.
"Some a lot of documents are to be recovered and accused A Raja is to be confronted with them," senior CBI prosecutor Akhilesh submitted.
Refuting allegations by Raja's counsel Ramesh Gupta that the agency had not disclosed to the court the end result of the probe conducted up to now during this case, Akhilesh said, "The case diary has already been submitted to the court. every and everything can't be disclosed within the open courtroom."
Opposing CBI's demand for four a lot of days of Raja's custody, Gupta said, "I am not having the custody of any document, that the CBI desires to get over me."
"Whatever documents were there, they need already been seized by them in 2009 itself," he added.
About Behura and Chandolia, the CBI counsel said the agency not wants their custody. "The 2 are often sent to Tihar Jail underneath judicial custody," he said.
The CBI had on February three rd been granted five-day custody of Raja and his 2 aides in reference to the 2G spectrum scam. The agency has accused the previous minister of inflicting a loss of Rs twenty two,000 crore to the exchequer by favouring some telecom corporations in award of the 2G spectrum licences.
This is for the primary time that the CBI is directly accusing Raja of complicity within the 2G scam when it had filed an FIR against unknown officers and personal persons and corporations on October twenty one, 2009.
Though the agency has pegged the loss at Rs twenty two,000 crore based mostly on the calculations created by the CVC, the CAG had in its report had projected a presumptive loss of Rs one.76 lakh crore.
The 3 were arrested for allegedly abusing their official position and favouring some telecom firms in grant of licences by manipulating the procedures.
Read more: CBI gets 2-day extension of custody for A Raja - the days of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/CBI-gets-2-day-extension-of-custody-for-A-Raja/articleshow/7451984.cms#ixzz1DOKJMg4f
Official sources said the CBI grilled Raja on his alleged investments and connections with sure firms based mostly in Chennai and a few alternative cities.
He was confronted with seized documents and asked specific queries based mostly on a similar.
The sources said names of some former bureaucrats have conjointly cropped up throughout the questioning and a lot of arrests are possible to require place soon.
Asked how soon, sources said probably by the February eight as sure info has to be worked on.
Raja along side his former personal secretary R K Chandolia and former telecom secretary Siddharth Behura were conjointly questioned on the last minute changes in spectrum policy that were place in place.
Meanwhile, the agency conjointly questioned former Deputy Director General (Access Control) of DoT A K Srivastava for many hours. Sources said the agency conjointly examined R K Gupta, another DoT official.
Raja, Chandolia and Behura were arrested by the agency on Wednesday and were remanded to 5 days of police custody by a special CBI Court yesterday.
The agency has alleged that the accused conspired with some personal firms in putting a cap on the utmost variety of applications that may well be entertained for the grant of licences.
This was against the recommendations of the TRAI, the telecom watchdog, that the competitive bidding method ought to be most well-liked over the first-come-first-serve basis, it had said within the Court.
"The DoT officers had selectively leaked the data to a number of the corporates relating to the date of issuance of letters of intent on January ten, 2008," it said, adding that as a result, solely few of the businesses were able to deposit the licence fee.
The probe agency had lodged an FIR on October twenty one, 2009 against some unknown persons within the case.
The Enforcement Directorate has conjointly registered a case underneath Prevention of cash Laundering Act (PMLA) and is running a parallel probe.
Reacting to him, Justice Shivraj Patil, Former choose, Supreme Court, said that his report wasn't involved regarding financial losses to the exchequer. In an interview to CNBC-TV18’s Siddharth Zarabi Patil clarified that finding criminal culpability, money irregularities was beyond the mandate of the report.
Justice Shivraj Patil, Former choose, Supreme Court
Here is that the verbatim transcript of his interview. additionally watch the accompanying video.
Q: does one accept as true with the kind of broad conclusion that the Minister has made? is that this the total and substance of your report that every one spectrum allocations together with the beginning up allocation of four.4 the extra one.8 post that and everything beyond six.2 was dangerous and not in conformity with law and procedures as laid down by DoT?
A: i need to form one factor terribly clear within the starting itself. I don't would like to feature something over what I actually have said within the report. more the Minister whereas creating the report public has extensively quoted from my report paragraph by paragraph. So, those are the contents of my report and no matter I actually have stated within the report they're pretty much obtainable to everyone currently.
Q: will your report recommend that from 2003 onwards when Unified Access Service license regime was adopted, the then Minister and former Secretary violated sure tips and framed rules that allowed for the grant of spectrum at the previous policy rates underneath the essential service license. That was a acutely aware call of the govt. at that time of your time to form certain that telecom services stay reasonable. therefore what extremely was the violation during this context?
A: I actually have no comments on each - the choices taken by the govt. at relevant purpose of your time in their knowledge. All that I will say is my jurisdiction or the scope of labor was confined to the procedures and policies at one facet and whether or not they were followed or not. What are the results and what that they had in their mind, what were the gains or losses they will not concern the least bit. I actually have stated and even the components of reports, they need been released. for example a cupboard call of thirty one October, 2001 it spoke of one thing else and that i got to inspect the policy, the rules and therefore the government orders or directions and whether or not whereas flowing they need been kept in read or there have been violations. That’s all my jurisdiction and that i haven't any alternative comment of what happened or what were the regions, why that they had taken a choice. All those things I actually have no comments to form.
Q: One couldn’t accept as true with you a lot of on the actual fact that attributable to the terms of reference you looked into procedural problems. whereas you were observing of these procedural violations did any criminal violation additionally return to your notice and has your report bought that to the eye of the DoT?
A: i need to create it terribly clear and that i have said it in my report that I actually have a involved solely with regard to the procedural irregularities and not with regard to criminal culpability or money implications. they're within the totally different jurisdiction. that's why I actually have said it in my preface of my report itself. I actually have not examined from that angle as a result of doing therefore was travelling beyond my jurisdiction.
Q: therefore your report talks regarding twenty five specific instances from 2001 to 2009 that has been identified by your committee of deviation inappropriate – application and violation of underneathlying principles – have you ever quantified in terms of the entire spectrum given under these twenty five specific instances that has been done wrongly as your report looks to suggest?
A: No. No quantification is there as a result of it absolutely was not needed of being. i need to create it terribly straight and clear that I actually have not quantified in terms of a spectrum.
Q: From a basic reading of the report it looks to recommend that 1st return 1st function a policy maybe existed from 2001 onwards in 2003. additionally it absolutely was place into impact and extremely thus 1st return 1st serve wasn't arbitrarily solely applied in 2008. it absolutely was additionally applied from 2003 onwards – is that conclusion the proper reading and interpretation of your report?
A: No, I actually have said within the starting itself i'll not say. The report itself speaks for it and my commenting whether or not it's right or wrong, whether or not it's correct might not be acceptable. I actually have said it no matter I had to mention in my report that's a foothold that I actually have explained.
Q: My final question to you in terms of rectifications and therefore the suggestions you've got created regarding enhancements with regard to future policy – are you able to a minimum of share with us what are the few most vital recommendations in your read that the DoT and therefore the policy maker ought to implement within the days ahead?
A: that's right. The last term of reference specifically term of reference range eight specifically kind the suggestion and therefore the remedial measures for the long run. I created sure suggestions, vital being the spectrum should be addressing confirmed license and spectrum allocation should be by method of public auction. There should be comprehensive new telecom legislation like Radio Communications Act that is there in alternative countries like New Zealand and Australia.
I have additionally created another suggestion that there should be spectrum audit from time to time. I actually have additionally steered that the allotment of the spectrum created to totally different licenses should be obtainable on web site which should be in public domain in order that everything becomes honest and clear. These are few of my suggestions.
Why are the two abandon afraid to angle on the issue?
The activity is of the appearance that the PAC has a bound administration and that won't be abundant to dig abysmal into the irregularities believed to accept been commited in the allocation of second-generation telephony spectrum, a bound civic resource. The government, not giving in to the opposition's JPC demand, says a multi-pronged delving by the CBI , Enforcement Directorate, Income Tax and the PAC was abundant to investigate the charges.
Here is a adviser to the formation, administration and admiral of the two aldermanic committees - one which is ad hoc and the added that consistently scrutinizes the government account spending.
Definition: The PAC is constituted every year to scrutinise how the money accustomed by assembly has been spent by the government. It takes references alone from the government accountant report, which banned its role.
The agreement and activity of a JPC, a structured but ad hoc committee, are absolute by parliament. It is set up for acid a specific affair and its continuance is limited. Such a board is set up by a motion anesthetized in parliament. Its agreement of references depend on the motion and this is not bound to the analysis of government finances.
Effectiveness: Both the JPC and the PAC can alone attending at abstracts and appraise admiral admiral who affirm afore them. They can access at absolute abstracts based on their probe.
The PAC expresses no assessment on credibility of accepted government policy, but it is aural its administration to point out whether there has been a banking accident to the coffer in accustomed out that policy.
The authorization of a JPC depends on the motion basic it. Its recommendations accept actuating amount but it cannot force the government to yield any action. Many accomplished JPC letters accept been abandoned by the government of the day. The government can adjudge to conduct its own investigations on the base of a JPC report. But it has to address to assembly on the aftereffect activity on the JPC recommendations.
A JPC address can acclaim the case or the change in government policies, for example, abandoning of 2G licence, but the government can disagree with the JPC and debris to yield such action.
Power: Can a abbot be alleged to affirm afore the committees? If the PAC wants to catechism a abbot on any issue, the board has to get an approval from the apostle afore accomplishing so. The endure time a abbot has appeared afore the PAC was in 1966 if again agronomics abbot C. Subramaniam was asked to do so.
Prime Abbot Manmohan Singh has volunteered to depose afore the PAC if appropriate on the telecom spectrum allocation scandal.
For JPC to ask for any abbot to affirm depends on its agreement of references, which usually acquiesce it to catechism any government functionary, including the prime minister.
Raja was affected to abandon endure ages afterwards the government's accountant said Raja's behavior amount the government abutting to Rs. 1.76 lakh crore. The address of the Comptroller and Accountant General (CAG) faulted Raja for undervaluing spectrum to favour companies who were abundantly disqualified for 2G spectrum.
Raja is acceptable to be questioned on the affair of preponing dates for allocation of spectrum and on the role of his ancestors in some of the companies which allegedly acted as a foreground for assertive telecom firms which got spectrum amid September 2007 and January 2008. He flew to Delhi on Wednesday night from Chennai and told reporters that he would abet with CBI in the probe. "I will arise afore the CBI on December 24 at 10 am. I will arise for interrogation," he said.
Key allegation of the CAG address that had accusable the above Telecom Ministe
* 2G spectrum allocated to new players at throwaway prices
* Raja abandoned admonition of PM, accounts & law ministries
* Department of Telecom (DoT) action lacked transparency, fairness
* Undue alacrity in accepting and processing applications
* Violation of 2003 Cabinet accommodation to acquiesce added spectrum at 2001 prices
* Undue allowances to RComm, allocated spectrum advanced of others
* Undue advantage accustomed to Swan Telecom in spectrum allocation
* Value of spectrum allocated above apprenticed quantity
* DoT didn't chase its own convenance of aboriginal appear aboriginal serve in letter and spirit
The Supreme Court has asked the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to abide cachet letters on their investigations into the 2G betray to it by February 10, if the case will appear up for hearing. The CBI in its FIR had mentioned the accident as Rs. 22,000 crore based on the allegation of Central Vigilance Commission which had referred the case to it.
Earlier this week, accumulated lobbyist Niira Radia was aswell able by the CBI at her South Delhi farmhouse in affiliation with the scam. Radia, who was questioned for four hours, came beneath the scanner afterwards her taped telephonic conversations with assorted affecting humans including industrialists, politicians and journalists became public. The CBI aswell questioned above Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) arch Pradip Baijal in affiliation with the case. The bounds of Raja, Baijal and Radia were searched by the CBI beforehand this month. (With PTI Inputs)
Former telecoms Minister will appear CBI officials on tomorrow because of the Irregular allocation of the 2G spectrum.
CBI was sent the notice to appear tomorrow in the case oof 2g spectrum allocation. They sent notice under the Indian law section 160 of the criminal procedure code to allocate the 2G spectrum
Last few month ago, A raja was forced to resign his job, because of the 2g spectrum allocation scam nearly on 1 lakh crore.
This allocation was done between 2007 sep to 2008 Jan. That was done 2 years before.
The BJP senior leader Dr.Murli Manhor Joshi says currently want to examniing the CAG report in the 2G spectrum
Reported By Rajeshkumar P
Under the Section, a person is asked to join the investigation and share all information that he or she may have about a case.
It was not clear as to when Raja has been summoned by the CBI. The premises of Raja, Baijal and Radia were searched by the investigating agency earlier this month in connection with the case.
Following allegations relating to the 2G scam, Raja had on November 14 resigned as Telecom Minister.
Reported by,R.Raja B.E
In this case, CBI got important evendence regarding the 2G scame and also got the what is the current congress parties plans to divert the 2G scame.
After Supreme court questions, CBI raids many of the places. First CBI raids Raja's home in both places Tamilnadu and delhi.Yesterday raids nearly on 31 paces all over India.
In this yesterday raid mostly on tamilnadu DMK party persons. SO, DMK was unhappy for that incidence. Now Party leader got big headach for that incidence.
So only, Tamil NAdu CM went to ellagiri visit and discuss the parties suituvation in the forth comming election.
CBI came to Nira radia office and home, they raids regarding tap issue ad also the 2G issue.
CBI also raids the Telecom secretary Pradeep Baijal residence and his office. Not only these 2 locations.CBI raids on whole over tamilnadu nearly on 27 location. Now, Raids based on the 2G After Raja's Home raids.
Last few days before CBI raids on Raja's home.
Sonia Gandhi was rejected the Oppositions parties demand. Today, Dec 13, 2010, Congress president Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, we are not accepted the oppositions parties demand in the 2G scam issues.
Hence forth will not accepted to lock or wastage of the parliament session.we will continue the parliament if any of the problem, we hit out from the parliament.
Today meeting on the CPP Congress parliament parties general meeting held in delhi congress home.
Sonia addressing party people, JPC will not accepted one. Government investigate several ways in the Telecom Issues.
So, no need the JPC. BJP planing to redirect to the people from karnataka to this way.
Today BJP leaders said, Congress only responsible for collapsed winter session. Congress insult the indian democratic principles. They didn't accept the Indian human rights.
congress didn't accept the JPC to investigate the 2G telecom scam and CWG scam. Maximum number of parliament members are supported for this JPC. But congress was rejected. So, congress done mistake for indian law and order.
Congress was refused the maximum of the voice of demacracy so, congress party didn't mind about the indian democracy ,BJP spokesperson Prakash Javdekar said.
"This is worst politics to deflect attention from issues regarding scam for 2G, CWG, which will not be tolerated by the people," Javdekar said.
congress didn't accept the JPC to investigate the 2G telecom scam and CWG scam. Maximum number of parliament members are supported for this JPC. But congress was rejected. So, congress done mistake for indian law and order.
Congress was refused the maximum of the voice of demacracy so, congress party didn't mind about the indian democracy ,BJP spokesperson Prakash Javdekar said.
"This is worst politics to deflect attention from issues regarding scam for 2G, CWG, which will not be tolerated by the people," Javdekar said.
Last Wednesday CBI(Central Bureau of Investigation) Raids the Raja's 2 homes Chennai and Delhi. yesterday night Raja came into Chennai.
He said, i will prov my innocence and also i cooperate the any investigation regading 2G issue.
Also he said, "I obey any procedure during the investigation and i am always ready to obey the rules and regulations".
In the 2G scam auditor general committee find the 2G spectrum scam, its nearly 1.76 lakhs crore.
N0w all the Oppositions parties are want the JPC to find the solution for 2G scam.
Last 20 days parliament affected the 2G scam issue. Oppositions are want the MP's Joint Parliamentary Committee find the solution and find the scam.
Two days before CBI raids M rajs's home in both the places Chennai, Delhi and also his native place in the permbalur district. After that Raja said , I will always cooperate anything needed to the CBI.
Yesterday Union cabinet minister raja came from Delhi to Chennai ini the airport, He surrounded with the all the press and media people. he said he will always cooperate any investigations. He will always follow the TRAI rules. I will prove am a innocence person.
BJP(Bhratiya Janata Party) Leaders said, this is an eye wash. This announcement not in the parliment. If central government will not follow the indian law,.
If they announces in the parliment, we may support the 2G allocation scam. They announced privatly to enquire about the 2G scam. So, this is just an eye wash to enquire 2G corruption.
One man commette member is retired Supreme Court judge. But we will not back to our thought. we want Joint Parliment Commette.Arun Jaitley said.
Arun Jaitley also said, this one man commette announced only kapil sibal privatly to find the solution for 2G scam corruption. But , this is not correct way to find the solution.
Last 20 days, BJP-led NDA asked JPC- Joint Parliment Committee problem in the 2G telecom scam in the raja's.
When lok shabha, started on today morning, all the oppostions wants to JPC to solve the india's biggest scam of 2G allocation telecom. So, lok sabha adjurned the house till noon.
Rajya Sabha has also seen such adjournments since Nov 10, a day after the winter session of Parliament began.
In the 2G Telecom issue, CBI asked time line into next year feb 2011. Because it is big scam.
In 2008, Telecom minister Raja, 2G allocation scam worth nearly 1.76 crore. How all the auditors and top leader doesn't know about this big scam on that year and day.
This worth established by governemt auditors nearly 1lakh and 76 crore. Why former telecom minister follow the beneficiary in the government and also how he gave license to the ineligible companies.
Earlier this week, in what he described as an "open letter," former telecom entrepreneur and Rajya Sabha MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar said Ratan Tata's company had been shown special favor by former Telecom Minister A Raja.
Responding to that, Mr Tata has written to Mr Chandrasekhar today stating, "Your affiliation to a political party is well-known and it appears that their political aspirations and their endeavor to embarrass the Prime Minister ...may well have been the motivation behind your letter."
We are not hesitate to sack Raja when he is guilty in the telecom issue.
Also Karunanidh said, former telecom minister done his job without any problem. So, he is no wrong on his job and also he followed the TRAI rules.
DMK supprots Raja to continue as a DMK persion until unless CBI take on any action.
DMK leader also confused in the Raja's issue. He is 2 mined Raja's matter. He is thiniking it will affect 2011 assembly election.so, DMK is safe. If Raja found as guilty, DMK sack him for the purpose of 2011 assembly election.
Raids going all the Raja's residences including delhi and chennai homes.
2G telecom scam issues was helpup with former telecom minister Raja. So, today CBI raids on to Raja's home and also raids other 4 top officers home also.
Supreme court asked CBI, Why CBI going slow on this case and also why CBI not yet take any action on this 2G scam issue.
Today raid also depending on the supreme court questions and we will wait and watch ?
Now no one of the opposition parties disn'er allow thw parliment activities for last 17 days. opp. didn't go back to his demands for JPC(Joint Parliment Commette) problem to the spectrum issues.
* Oppn intensifies demand for JPC in 2G; wants PM to appear
* 'Only JPC probe can bring truth out in 2G scam'
* Pawar told No split in UPA on JPC
* Congress told No Joint Parliment Commette and no rift with allies
Above all the comments are all agreed and call to the Opp.
Yesterday night UPA planning to the his parties meeting, But, Last minute meeting was cancelled and call to to JPC and postponded.
Meeting expected witth in couple of days.
Bansal said "We are under no pressure from anyone. But then we keep on discussing things. It is a dynamic process. Meetings do take place from time to time,"
