Innocent civilians, perarivalan, cantan, Murugan, the President rejected his mercy petition to remove the penalty kick, then they accept the authority of the mercy petition to the state Chief Minister Selvi ceyalalita not willing to play fair.
161 Constitution and the rule of law and Clause 72 (3), the President rejected the mercy petitions to the Governor that the state clarify the authority to accept and confirm the deletion of the sentence hanging. Rule 72 gives the President authority to remove the penalty kick. The fate of the inner section (3) the President's decision on a clemency petition with modeled hierarchical single decision taken without regard to the state governor has the right to etukkalamenru.
Tayacin Supreme Court case against this right of the Indian Union Government, tirivenicel the case against the Gujarat state government has confirmed. These are the last 15 days kurittellam Tamil Desam Party and various political movements of communism, civil organizations, legal professionals, are coming to get clear. L. piyuci. Canrukalutanum chief legal system needed for, letter to the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu has tirppukalutanum.
Legend says that the above details without uriyavaru nirakarittap of the President, has not rejected his mercy petition to the governor the authority to accept. With the Constitution and the rule of law and also Sub 257 (2) also authorizes the state to modify the decision, citing the federal government has not.
Importance to the fate of 257 57 - Sub Section (2) the importance to the National Highway, தொடர்வண்டிப்பாதை, waterway transport, and 257 - also its Sub (2) also said that the Indian government's authority to control state power.
The state above the state atikarankalaiyo, accepting his mercy petition to remove the death penalty, the governor's atikarattaiyo, any authority to control the destiny of the Indian state 257 - and its subcategories are not provided. In 1981 the Supreme Court in the case of marurram mercy petition against the Indian government decided not subject to the authority of the Governor, the President's authority. We judge that it is authorized to act separately. R. Krishna Iyer. After the President rejected his mercy petition to the state (for governor), Chief Minister Selvi ceyalalita willing to hold tiripuvatamakum to accept his mercy petition.
CA Ballon after rejecting his mercy petition in the Kerala Chief Minister, who was then the Republican leader. M. நம்பூதிரிபாடுஅவர்களும் S. (1957), who was then minister of Kerala, V. Legal. R. Using their own destiny CA 161 Balan Krishna Aiyar accept his mercy petition to remove the death sentence announced. After accepting his mercy petition by the Indian government lift the punishment laid down C. Ballon. Prior to this party pinparriya perarivalan example, cantan, Murugan to accept his mercy petition to review and bring resolution to the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. Bud, it do not have the authority to cancel the state of the seriousness of this issue that he show otunkikkol.
Government adamantly refused to take it for discussion. Chief Minister's attitude is not good too.
The announcement to hold the state Chief Minister Selvi ceyalalita today (29.8.2011) Legislative Act 110 - veliyittullar under. Assembly members not to discuss the Minister's announcement of the declaration made under the law to prevent. Managed care can save lives with this uttiyalla three Tamils.
The whole of Tamil Nadu Tamils and the multinational's demand for three Tamil lift the punishment laid creation in mind, the kurramilaikkata innocent's life in preserving the caring Nadu Chief Minister Selvi ceyalalita state state the power using three of the hanging sentence to remove the Tamil Nationalist Socialist Party, on behalf of the request.
Thanks http://www.keetru.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16338:2011-08-29-01-57-20&catid=1:articles&Itemid=264
